U.S. MSB Daily News
USMSB.com – Washington’s money cops may soon have a new boss.
The U.S. Treasury Department is floating a draft plan that would put its Financial Crimes Enforcement Network—better known as FinCEN—in the driver’s seat on how banks are punished for anti–money laundering failures, according to a proposal making the rounds among regulators.
The Wall Street Journal first revealed the scheme, which would turn FinCEN into a kind of final umpire on enforcement under the Bank Secrecy Act. The Federal Reserve, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, and the FDIC would have to run their AML crackdowns past FinCEN before lowering the boom.
In plain English: FinCEN could nix or soften penalties if it thinks a bank is still a valuable pipeline of intel on bad guys—even if examiners find messy systems and compliance slip-ups.
From Paperwork Police to “Results Only”
The move fits right in with the Trump administration’s pledge to slash red tape it says is stifling growth while doing little to stop hardened criminal networks.
For years, banks have blasted the AML rules as a costly, box-ticking circus—pumping out millions of reports that never lead to a single arrest, while getting hammered over formatting flubs and minor system settings.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent seems to agree. He’s argued that regulators have buried banks in requirements that don’t actually stop drug cartels, kleptocrats, and terror financiers from moving money through the system.
Early on, the administration even kicked the tires on merging some banking watchdogs. Now, Bessent is flexing Treasury’s muscles, trying to pull the agencies into line—and closer to what the industry’s been demanding for years.
New Sheriff in Town
Under the draft blueprint, before the Fed, OCC, or FDIC launch an AML enforcement action, they’d need to check in with FinCEN.
FinCEN’s big question: Is this bank giving law enforcement juicy, high-value suspicious activity reports that match national AML priorities set after the 2021 reforms?
If the answer is yes, that could mean fewer fines—or none at all—even if the bank’s transaction-monitoring system isn’t perfect or its documentation is a mess.
The idea is to reward banks that actually help catch crooks, not those that simply drown regulators in low-quality paperwork.
A source familiar with the talks stresses this isn’t a done deal. The proposal is still being tweaked and would have to slog through the full rulemaking grinder, including public comments, before it becomes law.
Smarter Enforcement or Softer Touch?
Ever since the Bank Secrecy Act hit the books in 1970, banks have been on the hook as front-line sentries against dirty money—screening customers, monitoring transactions, and flagging everything from garden-variety fraud to terror financing.
Supporters of Treasury’s plan say the current regime is broken and bloated. They argue a FinCEN-led model could cut down on useless reports, sharpen priorities, and steer resources toward truly dangerous activity.
Critics aren’t so sure. Handing FinCEN the final say, they warn, could backfire if watchdogs hesitate to crack down on big institutions that serve as prized intelligence sources. Some fear the system could tilt too far toward “cooperation” and away from real accountability.
For now, the message from Treasury is clear: less nitpicking, more impact. The administration is betting that with FinCEN calling the shots, banks will spend less time chasing typos—and more time helping law enforcement chase criminals.
U.S. MSB Daily News
Industry News • Regulatory Analysis • Learning Center
Leave a Reply